The true Story of Islam, is never well truly presented, and to most out there too. To truly better understand this, is to in all again, view Islam in all, from its three main branches: Traditional Islam (and as primarily associated with Prophet Muhammed), Secular Islam (and the very world of Al-Bukhari), and finally in all again Fundamentalist Islam (and with it being Solomonic/Abyssinian in its ways actually) {and as with even saying that, folks such as Andre Rigaud, actually did follow, Fundamentalist Islam}.
In all, Islam to the masses, is actually often truly, presented from the perspective, of Secular Islam. This being again, the very History of Islam in all, and as a Social Movement too, and one calling for change, not only in the Middle East, but in other parts of the World too, and where Islam in itself, could be of great benefit to most actually. In all (and surprisingly enough), a version of the History of Islam, that does view Islam in all, from not only the Mohammedan Sect, its Sufi based Music, but also, Mysticism in many ways, and as associated truly, with Islam in itself actually. Again, this is not the view of the History of Islam, and as perceived even, by many a Scholar (or Academic too even), and in the Middle East too. And with they in all again, adhering to the version of the History of Islam, associated in all again, with Traditional Islam actually. A version of the History of Islam, that in all ways even, truly views Islam, as only primarily connected with Prophet Muhammed, and in all ways truly, a version of Islam that speaks of the Prophets Journey, from not only Ethiopia in itself, but onwards to Oman, and finally to Bahrain {and as with it even, a personal odyssey, in the creating and spread of Islam too that is} {that in many ways, he actually did it all by himself, and with this version of the History of Islam, presenting Islam in all again, from a rather Mythic perspective actually (as with it containing figures in all too really, whose actual presence in the History of Islam, cannot be truly proven, and as with saying that, this version of the History of Islam, does truly acknowledge and understand that, the rise of Islam in all, was very much an Odyssey actually, and in all again, the very attempt to make sense, of just how this 'miracle' in all, did actually happen)}.
However though, there is still a third way of viewing the History of Islam in itself: that being, the Fundamentalist Islam view of things that is. It is a view of Islam in all again, that does speak of the History of Islam, from its two main figures: Prophet Muhammed and Al-Bukhari; but speaking of them in all again, from the perspective, of Interpreting/Presenting, and Delineating/Packaging, both the words/works of Prophet Muhammed and Al-Bukhari respectively, and in just about a million ways actually {that in all, the words/works of Prophet Muhammed, can be presented in all, in just about a million ways and as can the very words/works too, of Al-Bukhari, be Delineated/Packaged, in just about a million ways too actually (and with each presentation and packaging format in all, revealing Islam, and in a rather new way in all too really)} {and as with the further belief that, Islam, is something truly not Knowable to most, and with exception, with those with the Mind of Allah actually}.
@ in many ways truly, those who do follow Traditional Islam in all, do center it all, around the Qu'ran actually, while those who do follow Secular Islam in all, do center it in all again, around the Mosque at Mecca, and with those who do follow Fundamentalist Islam in all, centering it all, around the so called 'Sword of Allah' actually.
'the Abyssinian'
